-
1 formal object
Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > formal object
-
2 formal object
1) Математика: формальный объект2) Психология: абстракция или отдельный аспект предмета -
3 formal object
формальный объект; абстракция или отдельный аспект предмета -
4 formal object
мат. -
5 formal object
Англо-русский словарь по исследованиям и ноу-хау > formal object
-
6 object
1) возражать2) объект || объектный3) предмет || предметный•- completely symmetric object - universally repelling object -
7 object
I 'ob‹ikt noun1) (a thing that can be seen or felt: There were various objects on the table.) gjenstand, ting2) (an aim or intention: His main object in life was to become rich.) mål, hensikt3) (the word or words in a sentence or phrase which represent(s) the person or thing affected by the action of the verb: He hit me; You can eat what you like.) objektII əb'‹ekt verb(often with to) to feel or express dislike or disapproval: He wanted us to travel on foot but I objected (to that). innvende, ha noe imot- objectionable
- objectionablyformål--------gjenstand--------hensikt--------mål--------objekt--------sikte--------tingIsubst. \/ˈɒbdʒɪkt\/1) ( også overført) gjenstand, objekt, ting2) formål, hensikt, mening• the object of the society is to...foreningens formål er å...jeg kan ikke se hva det skal være godt for \/ jeg kan ikke se hensikten med detdet skal ikke stå på penger\/prisen spiller ingen rolle3) mål• the students started the campaign with the object of raising money to charitystudentene startet kampanjen med det mål for øye å skaffe penger til veldedighet4) ( hverdagslig) ynkelig syn, usselt syn• what an object you look in that outfit!5) ( grammatikk) objektsalary no object ( i annonse) lønnsspørsmålet er underordnetIIverb \/əbˈdʒekt\/1) innvende, ha innvendinger, protestere2) tilbakevise, trekke i tvilobject to ha innvendinger mot, protestere motikke tåle, ikke like, mislike -
8 formal design
1) Сельское хозяйство: проект регулярного стиля (сада)2) Реклама: формальный образец3) Программирование: формальный проект (см. Auslander D.M., Ridgely J.R., Ringgenberg J.D. Control Software for Mechanical Systems. Object-Oriented Design in a Real-Time World) -
9 formal design paradigm
Программирование: парадигма (система понятий) формального проекта (см. Auslander D.M., Ridgely J.R., Ringgenberg J.D. Control Software for Mechanical Systems. Object-Oriented Design in a Real-Time World)Универсальный англо-русский словарь > formal design paradigm
-
10 formal approach
at our approach — при нашем приближении, когда мы подошли
English-Russian dictionary on nuclear energy > formal approach
-
11 you [singular and plural subject and direct object] [formal]
DeEnglish-Danish mini dictionary > you [singular and plural subject and direct object] [formal]
-
12 формальный объект
Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > формальный объект
-
13 FORML
Вычислительная техника: Formal Object Role Modelling Language -
14 obtrude
-
15 unconsidered
unconsidered [‚ʌnkən'sɪdəd](a) (thought, action) irréfléchiUn panorama unique de l'anglais et du français > unconsidered
-
16 you
ju:1) ((used as the subject or object of a verb, or as the object of a preposition) the person(s) etc spoken or written to: You look well!; I asked you a question; Do you all understand?; Who came with you?) tú, vosotros, vosotras, usted, ustedes (sujeto); se, uno (sujeto impersonal); te, ti, os (complemento); la, le, lo, los, las (complemento directo); le, les (complemento indirecto); contigo (|with| you)2) (used with a noun when calling someone something, especially something unpleasant: You idiot!; You fools!) cacho, ¡pero serás (idiota)!you pron1. tú / ti / usted / vosotros / ustedeswhat would you like, sir? ¿qué quiere, señor?do you understand? ¿entendéis?can you help me? ¿me pueden ayudar?2. te / le / la / lo / os / les / las / loscan I help you? ¿puedo ayudarle?3.tr[jʊː]1 (subject, familiar, singular) túand what did you say? y tú, ¿qué dijiste?2 (subject, familiar, plural - men) vosotros; (- women) vosotrasyou two, where are you going? vosotros dos, ¿adónde vais?3 (subject, polite, singular) usted, Vd., Ud.4 (subject, polite, plural) ustedes, Vds., Uds.5 (subject, impersonal) se, unosometimes you just have to say no, don't you? a veces, uno tiene que decir que no, ¿verdad?I'm going with you, without you I'm lost voy contigo, sin ti estoy perdido7 (object, familiar, plural) os; (with preposition) vosotros,-asgood morning, sir, can I help you? buenos días, señor, ¿puedo ayudarlo?I'm sorry madam, I can't hear you perdone señora, no la oigogood morning, gentlemen, can I help you? buenos días, señores, ¿puedo ayudarlos?I'm sorry ladies, I don't understand you lo siento señoras, no las entiendogentlemen, this is for you señores, esto es para ustedes10 (indirect object, polite, singular) le11 (indirect object, polite, plural) les12 (object, impersonal)you ['ju:] pron1) (used as subject - familiar) : tú; vos in some Latin American countries; ustedes pl; vosotros, vosotras pl Spainhe told it to you: te lo contóI gave them to (all of, both of) you: se los di5) (used after a preposition - familiar) : ti; vos in some Latin American countries; ustedes pl; vosotros, vosotras pl Spainyou never know: nunca se sabeyou have to be aware: hay que ser conscienteyou mustn't do that: eso no se hace8)9)pron.• le pron.• te pron. (formal)pron.• usted pron. (formal, plural)pron.• vosotros pron.pl. (informal)pron.• tú pron.• ustedes pron.pron.• te pron.juː1) ( sing)a) ( as subject - familiar) tú, vos (AmC, RPl); (- formal) ustednow you try — ahora prueba tú/pruebe usted, ahora probá vos (AmC, RPl)
if I were you — yo que tú/que usted, yo en tu/en su lugar, yo que vos (AmC, RPl)
b) ( as direct object - familiar) te; (- formal, masculine) lo, le (Esp); (- formal, feminine) laI saw you, Pete — te vi, Pete
I saw you, Mr Russell — lo vi, señor Russell, le vi, señor Russell (Esp)
c) ( as indirect object - familiar) te; (- formal) le; (- with direct object pronoun present) seI told you — te dije/le dije
I gave it to you — te lo di/se lo di
d) ( after prep - familiar) ti, vos (AmC, RPl); (- formal) ustedfor you — para ti/usted, para vos (AmC, RPl)
with you — contigo/con usted
2) (pl)a) (as subject, after preposition - familiar) ustedes (AmL), vosotros, -tras (Esp); (- formal) ustedesbe quiet, you two — ustedes dos: cállense!, vosotros dos: callaos! (Esp)
come on, you guys! — vamos, chicos
b) ( as direct object - familiar) los, las (AmL), os (Esp); (- formal, masculine) los, les (Esp); (- formal, feminine) lasI heard you, gentlemen — los or (Esp tb) les oí, caballeros
I heard you, boys/girls — los/las oí, chicos/chicas (AmL), os oí, chicos/chicas (Esp)
c) ( as indirect object - familiar) les (AmL), os (Esp); (- formal) les; (- with direct object pronoun present) seI gave you the book — les or (Esp tb) os di el libro
I gave it to you — se or (Esp tb) os lo di
3) ( one)a) ( as subject) uno, unayou can't do that here — aquí uno no puede or no se puede or no puedes hacer eso
b) ( as direct object) tepeople stop you in the street and ask for money — la gente te para en la calle y te pide dinero, la gente lo para a uno en la calle y le pide dinero
c) ( as indirect object) tethey never tell you the truth — nunca te dicen la verdad, nunca le dicen la verdad a uno
[juː]PRON Note that subject pronouns are used less in Spanish than in English - mainly for emphasis or to avoid ambiguity.1) (sing)what do you think about it? — ¿y tú que piensas?
I told you to do it — te dije a ti que lo hicieras, es a ti a quien dije que lo hicieras
•
it's for you — es para ti•
she's taller than you — es más alta que tú•
can I come with you — ¿puedo ir contigo?b) frm (=as subject) usted, Ud, Vd; (as direct object) lo/la, le (Sp); (as indirect object) le; (after prep) usted, Ud, VdChange [le] to [se] before a direct object pronoun:I saw you, Mrs Jones — la vi, señora Jones
•
this is for you — esto es para usted•
they're taller than you — son más altos que usted2) (pl)a) (familiar) (=as subject) vosotros(-as) (Sp), ustedes (LAm); (as direct object) os (Sp), los/las (LAm); (as indirect object) os (Sp), les (LAm); (after prep) vosotros(-as) (Sp), ustedes (LAm)you're sisters, aren't you? — vosotras sois hermanas, ¿no?
you stay here, and I'll go and get the key — (vosotros) quedaos aquí, que yo iré a por la llave
•
I live upstairs from you — vivo justo encima de vosotros•
they've done it better than you — lo han hecho mejor que vosotros•
they'll go without you — irán sin vosotrosb) frm (=as subject) ustedes, Uds, Vds; (as direct object) los/las, les (Sp); (as indirect object) les; (after prep) ustedes, Uds, Vdsare you brothers? — ¿son (ustedes) hermanos?
Change [les] to [se] before a direct object pronoun:may I help you? — ¿puedo ayudarlos?
•
we arrived after you — llegamos después de ustedes3) (general)When you means "one" or "people" in general, the impersonal se is often used:you can't do that — no se puede hacer eso, eso no se hace, eso no se permite
you can't smoke here — no se puede fumar aquí, no se permite fumar aquí, se prohíbe fumar aquí
A further possibility is [uno]:you never know, you never can tell — nunca se sabe
Impersonal constructions are also used:you never know whether... — uno nunca sabe si...
you need to check it every day — hay que comprobarlo cada día, conviene comprobarlo cada día
you doctors! — ¡vosotros, los médicos!
•
between you and me — entre tú y yo•
you fool! — ¡no seas tonto!•
that's lawyers for you! — ¡para que te fíes de los abogados!there's a pretty girl for you! — ¡mira que chica más guapa!
•
if I were or was you — yo que tú, yo en tu lugar•
you there! — ¡oye, tú!YOU When translating you, even though you often need not use the pronoun itself, you will have to choose between using familiar tú/vosotros verb forms and the polite usted/ ustedes ones. ► In Spain, use tú and the plural vosotros/ vosotras with anyone you call by their first name, with children and younger adults. Use usted/ ustedes with people who are older than you, those in authority and in formal contexts. ► In Latin America usage varies depending on the country and in some places only the usted forms are used. Where the tú form does exist, only use it with people you know very well. In other areas vos, used with verb forms that are similar to the vosotros ones, often replaces tú. This is standard in Argentina and certain Central American countries while in other countries it is considered substandard. Use ustedes for all cases of you in the plural. For further uses and examples, see main entry•
that dress just isn't you — ese vestido no te sienta bien* * *[juː]1) ( sing)a) ( as subject - familiar) tú, vos (AmC, RPl); (- formal) ustednow you try — ahora prueba tú/pruebe usted, ahora probá vos (AmC, RPl)
if I were you — yo que tú/que usted, yo en tu/en su lugar, yo que vos (AmC, RPl)
b) ( as direct object - familiar) te; (- formal, masculine) lo, le (Esp); (- formal, feminine) laI saw you, Pete — te vi, Pete
I saw you, Mr Russell — lo vi, señor Russell, le vi, señor Russell (Esp)
c) ( as indirect object - familiar) te; (- formal) le; (- with direct object pronoun present) seI told you — te dije/le dije
I gave it to you — te lo di/se lo di
d) ( after prep - familiar) ti, vos (AmC, RPl); (- formal) ustedfor you — para ti/usted, para vos (AmC, RPl)
with you — contigo/con usted
2) (pl)a) (as subject, after preposition - familiar) ustedes (AmL), vosotros, -tras (Esp); (- formal) ustedesbe quiet, you two — ustedes dos: cállense!, vosotros dos: callaos! (Esp)
come on, you guys! — vamos, chicos
b) ( as direct object - familiar) los, las (AmL), os (Esp); (- formal, masculine) los, les (Esp); (- formal, feminine) lasI heard you, gentlemen — los or (Esp tb) les oí, caballeros
I heard you, boys/girls — los/las oí, chicos/chicas (AmL), os oí, chicos/chicas (Esp)
c) ( as indirect object - familiar) les (AmL), os (Esp); (- formal) les; (- with direct object pronoun present) seI gave you the book — les or (Esp tb) os di el libro
I gave it to you — se or (Esp tb) os lo di
3) ( one)a) ( as subject) uno, unayou can't do that here — aquí uno no puede or no se puede or no puedes hacer eso
b) ( as direct object) tepeople stop you in the street and ask for money — la gente te para en la calle y te pide dinero, la gente lo para a uno en la calle y le pide dinero
c) ( as indirect object) tethey never tell you the truth — nunca te dicen la verdad, nunca le dicen la verdad a uno
-
17 Language
Philosophy is written in that great book, the universe, which is always open, right before our eyes. But one cannot understand this book without first learning to understand the language and to know the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and the characters are triangles, circles, and other figures. Without these, one cannot understand a single word of it, and just wanders in a dark labyrinth. (Galileo, 1990, p. 232)It never happens that it [a nonhuman animal] arranges its speech in various ways in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do. (Descartes, 1970a, p. 116)It is a very remarkable fact that there are none so depraved and stupid, without even excepting idiots, that they cannot arrange different words together, forming of them a statement by which they make known their thoughts; while, on the other hand, there is no other animal, however perfect and fortunately circumstanced it may be, which can do the same. (Descartes, 1967, p. 116)Human beings do not live in the object world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection. The fact of the matter is that the "real world" is to a large extent unconsciously built on the language habits of the group.... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation. (Sapir, 1921, p. 75)It powerfully conditions all our thinking about social problems and processes.... No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same worlds with different labels attached. (Sapir, 1985, p. 162)[A list of language games, not meant to be exhaustive:]Giving orders, and obeying them- Describing the appearance of an object, or giving its measurements- Constructing an object from a description (a drawing)Reporting an eventSpeculating about an eventForming and testing a hypothesisPresenting the results of an experiment in tables and diagramsMaking up a story; and reading itPlay actingSinging catchesGuessing riddlesMaking a joke; and telling itSolving a problem in practical arithmeticTranslating from one language into anotherLANGUAGE Asking, thanking, cursing, greeting, and praying-. (Wittgenstein, 1953, Pt. I, No. 23, pp. 11 e-12 e)We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages.... The world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... No individual is free to describe nature with absolute impartiality but is constrained to certain modes of interpretation even while he thinks himself most free. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 153, 213-214)We dissect nature along the lines laid down by our native languages.The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... We are thus introduced to a new principle of relativity, which holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar or can in some way be calibrated. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 213-214)9) The Forms of a Person's Thoughts Are Controlled by Unperceived Patterns of His Own LanguageThe forms of a person's thoughts are controlled by inexorable laws of pattern of which he is unconscious. These patterns are the unperceived intricate systematizations of his own language-shown readily enough by a candid comparison and contrast with other languages, especially those of a different linguistic family. (Whorf, 1956, p. 252)It has come to be commonly held that many utterances which look like statements are either not intended at all, or only intended in part, to record or impart straightforward information about the facts.... Many traditional philosophical perplexities have arisen through a mistake-the mistake of taking as straightforward statements of fact utterances which are either (in interesting non-grammatical ways) nonsensical or else intended as something quite different. (Austin, 1962, pp. 2-3)In general, one might define a complex of semantic components connected by logical constants as a concept. The dictionary of a language is then a system of concepts in which a phonological form and certain syntactic and morphological characteristics are assigned to each concept. This system of concepts is structured by several types of relations. It is supplemented, furthermore, by redundancy or implicational rules..., representing general properties of the whole system of concepts.... At least a relevant part of these general rules is not bound to particular languages, but represents presumably universal structures of natural languages. They are not learned, but are rather a part of the human ability to acquire an arbitrary natural language. (Bierwisch, 1970, pp. 171-172)In studying the evolution of mind, we cannot guess to what extent there are physically possible alternatives to, say, transformational generative grammar, for an organism meeting certain other physical conditions characteristic of humans. Conceivably, there are none-or very few-in which case talk about evolution of the language capacity is beside the point. (Chomsky, 1972, p. 98)[It is] truth value rather than syntactic well-formedness that chiefly governs explicit verbal reinforcement by parents-which renders mildly paradoxical the fact that the usual product of such a training schedule is an adult whose speech is highly grammatical but not notably truthful. (R. O. Brown, 1973, p. 330)he conceptual base is responsible for formally representing the concepts underlying an utterance.... A given word in a language may or may not have one or more concepts underlying it.... On the sentential level, the utterances of a given language are encoded within a syntactic structure of that language. The basic construction of the sentential level is the sentence.The next highest level... is the conceptual level. We call the basic construction of this level the conceptualization. A conceptualization consists of concepts and certain relations among those concepts. We can consider that both levels exist at the same point in time and that for any unit on one level, some corresponding realizate exists on the other level. This realizate may be null or extremely complex.... Conceptualizations may relate to other conceptualizations by nesting or other specified relationships. (Schank, 1973, pp. 191-192)The mathematics of multi-dimensional interactive spaces and lattices, the projection of "computer behavior" on to possible models of cerebral functions, the theoretical and mechanical investigation of artificial intelligence, are producing a stream of sophisticated, often suggestive ideas.But it is, I believe, fair to say that nothing put forward until now in either theoretic design or mechanical mimicry comes even remotely in reach of the most rudimentary linguistic realities. (Steiner, 1975, p. 284)The step from the simple tool to the master tool, a tool to make tools (what we would now call a machine tool), seems to me indeed to parallel the final step to human language, which I call reconstitution. It expresses in a practical and social context the same understanding of hierarchy, and shows the same analysis by function as a basis for synthesis. (Bronowski, 1977, pp. 127-128)t is the language donn eґ in which we conduct our lives.... We have no other. And the danger is that formal linguistic models, in their loosely argued analogy with the axiomatic structure of the mathematical sciences, may block perception.... It is quite conceivable that, in language, continuous induction from simple, elemental units to more complex, realistic forms is not justified. The extent and formal "undecidability" of context-and every linguistic particle above the level of the phoneme is context-bound-may make it impossible, except in the most abstract, meta-linguistic sense, to pass from "pro-verbs," "kernals," or "deep deep structures" to actual speech. (Steiner, 1975, pp. 111-113)A higher-level formal language is an abstract machine. (Weizenbaum, 1976, p. 113)Jakobson sees metaphor and metonymy as the characteristic modes of binarily opposed polarities which between them underpin the two-fold process of selection and combination by which linguistic signs are formed.... Thus messages are constructed, as Saussure said, by a combination of a "horizontal" movement, which combines words together, and a "vertical" movement, which selects the particular words from the available inventory or "inner storehouse" of the language. The combinative (or syntagmatic) process manifests itself in contiguity (one word being placed next to another) and its mode is metonymic. The selective (or associative) process manifests itself in similarity (one word or concept being "like" another) and its mode is metaphoric. The "opposition" of metaphor and metonymy therefore may be said to represent in effect the essence of the total opposition between the synchronic mode of language (its immediate, coexistent, "vertical" relationships) and its diachronic mode (its sequential, successive, lineal progressive relationships). (Hawkes, 1977, pp. 77-78)It is striking that the layered structure that man has given to language constantly reappears in his analyses of nature. (Bronowski, 1977, p. 121)First, [an ideal intertheoretic reduction] provides us with a set of rules"correspondence rules" or "bridge laws," as the standard vernacular has it-which effect a mapping of the terms of the old theory (T o) onto a subset of the expressions of the new or reducing theory (T n). These rules guide the application of those selected expressions of T n in the following way: we are free to make singular applications of their correspondencerule doppelgangers in T o....Second, and equally important, a successful reduction ideally has the outcome that, under the term mapping effected by the correspondence rules, the central principles of T o (those of semantic and systematic importance) are mapped onto general sentences of T n that are theorems of Tn. (P. Churchland, 1979, p. 81)If non-linguistic factors must be included in grammar: beliefs, attitudes, etc. [this would] amount to a rejection of the initial idealization of language as an object of study. A priori such a move cannot be ruled out, but it must be empirically motivated. If it proves to be correct, I would conclude that language is a chaos that is not worth studying.... Note that the question is not whether beliefs or attitudes, and so on, play a role in linguistic behavior and linguistic judgments... [but rather] whether distinct cognitive structures can be identified, which interact in the real use of language and linguistic judgments, the grammatical system being one of these. (Chomsky, 1979, pp. 140, 152-153)23) Language Is Inevitably Influenced by Specific Contexts of Human InteractionLanguage cannot be studied in isolation from the investigation of "rationality." It cannot afford to neglect our everyday assumptions concerning the total behavior of a reasonable person.... An integrational linguistics must recognize that human beings inhabit a communicational space which is not neatly compartmentalized into language and nonlanguage.... It renounces in advance the possibility of setting up systems of forms and meanings which will "account for" a central core of linguistic behavior irrespective of the situation and communicational purposes involved. (Harris, 1981, p. 165)By innate [linguistic knowledge], Chomsky simply means "genetically programmed." He does not literally think that children are born with language in their heads ready to be spoken. He merely claims that a "blueprint is there, which is brought into use when the child reaches a certain point in her general development. With the help of this blueprint, she analyzes the language she hears around her more readily than she would if she were totally unprepared for the strange gabbling sounds which emerge from human mouths. (Aitchison, 1987, p. 31)Looking at ourselves from the computer viewpoint, we cannot avoid seeing that natural language is our most important "programming language." This means that a vast portion of our knowledge and activity is, for us, best communicated and understood in our natural language.... One could say that natural language was our first great original artifact and, since, as we increasingly realize, languages are machines, so natural language, with our brains to run it, was our primal invention of the universal computer. One could say this except for the sneaking suspicion that language isn't something we invented but something we became, not something we constructed but something in which we created, and recreated, ourselves. (Leiber, 1991, p. 8)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Language
-
18 you
pron.1 tú (subject) (usually omitted in Spanish, except for contrast) (singular), vos (especialmente R.Plata), usted ; vosotros(as) (España), ustedes (Am. or)2 te (direct object) (singular), lo(la) ; os (España), los(las) (Am. or)3 te (indirect object) (singular), le ; os (España), les (Am. or)4 ti (after preposition) (singular), usted ; vosotros(as) (España), ustedes (Am. or)you don't do that kind of thing esas cosas no se hacenyou never know nunca se sabeexercise is good for you es bueno hacer ejercicioyou have to be careful with him hay que o uno tiene que tener cuidado con él6 [como complemento del verbo "to be" ]oh, it's you! ¡ah, eres tú! (singular), ¡ah, es usted!; (Formal) ¡ah, sois vosotros! (plural) (español de España), ¡ah, son ustedes! (Formal) (Am or)it was you who did it fuiste tú quien lo hiciste (singular), fue usted quien lo hizo; (Formal) fuisteis vosotros quienes lo hicisteis (plural) (español de España), fueron ustedes quienes lo hicieron (Formal) (Am or)poor old you! ¡pobrecito!you idiot! ¡idiota!don't you forget! ¡no te olvides!you sit down here tú siéntate aquí; (singular) vosotros sentaos aquí (plural) (español de España), ustedes siéntense acá (Am)don't you dare! ¡ni se te ocurra!10 tú misma. -
19 that
ce ⇒ 1 (a), 2 (a) cela ⇒ 1 (a) ça ⇒ 1 (a) celui-là ⇒ 1 (b) celui ⇒ 1 (c) ce…-là ⇒ 2 (b) si ⇒ 3 (a), 3 (b) qui ⇒ 4 (a) que ⇒ 4 (b), 5 (a) lequel ⇒ 4 (c) où ⇒ 4 (d)(pl those [ðəʊz])∎ give me that donnez-moi ça;∎ after/before that après/avant cela;∎ what's that? qu'est-ce que c'est que ça?;∎ what's that (that) you're holding? qu'est-ce que tu as dans la main?;∎ that's Mr Thomas c'est M. Thomas;∎ is that you, Susan? c'est toi, Susan?;∎ is that all you've got to eat? c'est tout ce que vous avez à manger?;∎ what did she mean by that? qu'est-ce qu'elle voulait dire par là?;∎ those are my things ce sont mes affaires;∎ those are my orders voilà mes ordres;∎ those are my parents voilà mes parents;∎ that is what he told me c'est ou voilà ce qu'il m'a dit;∎ that is where I live c'est là que j'habite;∎ that was three months ago il y a trois mois de cela;∎ that's strange c'est bizarre;∎ I've only got one coat and that's old je n'ai qu'un manteau et encore, il est vieux;∎ so THAT'S how it works! c'est donc comme ça que ça marche!;∎ so THAT'S settled bon, ça c'est réglé ou voilà qui est réglé;∎ that's as may be peut-être bien;∎ familiar it's not as hot as (all) that! il ne fait pas si chaud que ça!;∎ so it's come to that voilà donc où nous en sommes (arrivés);∎ if it comes to that, you can always leave si ça en arrive là, vous pouvez toujours partir;∎ that's a good boy! en voilà un gentil petit garçon!;∎ that's all c'est tout, voilà tout;∎ that's all we need! il ne manquait plus que ça!;∎ that's enough (of that)! ça suffit!;∎ that's it for today! ce sera tout pour aujourd'hui!;∎ that's it! you've got it! c'est ça! tu as trouvé!;∎ that's life! c'est la vie!;∎ that's more like it! voilà qui est déjà mieux!;∎ well, that's that! eh bien voilà!;∎ I said "no" and that's that! j'ai dit "non", un point c'est tout!;∎ that's the government all over or for you! c'est bien l'administration ça!;∎ is she intelligent? - that she is! elle est intelligente? - ça oui ou pour sûr!;∎ familiar good stuff, that! ah c'est bon ça!(b) (in contrast to "this") celui-là (celle-là) m,f;∎ those ceux-là (celles-là) mpl, fpl;∎ this is an ash, that is an oak ceci est un frêne et ça, c'est un chêne;∎ which book do you prefer, this or that? quel livre préférez-vous, celui-ci ou celui-là?;∎ I'd like some flowers, but not those! j'aimerais des fleurs, mais pas celles-là!(c) (used when giving further information) celui (celle) m,f;∎ those ceux (celles) mpl, fpl;∎ there are those who believe that… il y a des gens qui croient que…;∎ I'm not one of those who… je ne suis pas du genre à ou de ceux qui…;∎ a sound like that of a baby crying un bruit comme celui que fait un bébé qui pleure;∎ the symptoms sound like those of malaria les symptômes ressemblent à ceux du paludisme;∎ he spoke with those concerned il a parlé à ceux qui sont concernés;∎ all those interested should contact the club secretary tous ceux qui sont intéressés doivent contacter le secrétaire du club(a) (the one indicated) ce (cette);∎ those ces;∎ that man cet homme;∎ those questions ces questions;∎ at that moment à ce moment-là;∎ it was raining that day il pleuvait ce jour-là;∎ in those days en ce temps-là, à cette époque;∎ we all agree on that point nous sommes tous d'accord là-dessus;∎ did you hear about that terrible accident on the motorway? as-tu entendu parler de ce terrible accident sur l'autoroute?;∎ do you remember that play we saw last year? tu te rappelles cette pièce que nous avons vue l'année dernière?;∎ how about that drink you offered me? et ce verre que vous m'avez proposé?;∎ I like that idea of his j'aime son idée;∎ how's that son of yours? comment va ton fils?;∎ pejorative if I get hold of that son of yours! si je mets la main sur ton sacré fils!;∎ that fool of a gardener cet imbécile de jardinier;∎ they rode off into the sunset, it was that kind of film ils se sont éloignés vers le soleil couchant, c'était ce genre de film, tu vois?(b) (in contrast to "this") ce…-là (cette…-là);∎ those ces…-là;∎ that house over there is for sale cette ou la maison là-bas est à vendre;∎ that one celui-là (celle-là) m,f;∎ choose between this restaurant and that one choisissez entre ce restaurant et l'autre;∎ familiar that there table cette table-là□∎ can you run that fast? pouvez-vous courir aussi vite que ça?;∎ he's not (all) that good-looking il n'est pas si beau que ça;∎ there's a pile of papers on my desk that high! il y a une pile de papiers haute comme ça sur mon bureau!;∎ I don't go there that often (not much) je n'y vais pas très souvent;∎ I don't go there THAT often je n'y vais pas aussi souvent que ça∎ he was that weak he couldn't stand il était tellement affaibli qu'il ne tenait plus debout;∎ I could have cried, I was that angry j'en aurais pleuré tellement j'étais en colèreⓘ GRAM On peut omettre le pronom relatif that sauf s'il est en position sujet.(a) (subject of verb) qui;∎ the conclusions that emerge from this les conclusions qui en ressortent;∎ nothing that matters rien d'important∎ the house that Miles built la maison que Miles a construite;∎ is this the best that you can do? est-ce que c'est ce que vous pouvez faire de mieux?;∎ fool that I am, I agreed imbécile que je suis, j'ai accepté;∎ pessimist/optimist that he is pessimiste/optimiste comme il est(c) (object of preposition) lequel (laquelle) m,f;∎ the box that I put it in/on le carton dans lequel/sur lequel je l'ai mis;∎ the songs that I was thinking of or about les chansons auxquelles je pensais;∎ the woman/the film that we're talking about la femme/le film dont nous parlons;∎ not that I know of pas que je sache∎ the week that he was sick la semaine où il était malade;∎ during the months that we were in Chicago pendant les mois que nous avons passés ou où nous étions à Chicagoⓘ GRAM Sauf dans la langue soutenue, la conjonction that est souvent omise.∎ I said that I had read it j'ai dit que je l'avais lu;∎ it's natural that you should be nervous c'est normal que vous soyez nerveux;∎ it's not that she isn't friendly ce n'est pas qu'elle ne soit pas amicale;∎ I'll see to it that everything is ready je veillerai à ce que tout soit prêt;∎ it was so dark that I could barely see il faisait si noir que je voyais à peine;∎ formal that he is capable has already been proven il a déjà prouvé qu'il était capable;∎ formal that I should live to see the day when… (expressing incredulity) je n'aurais jamais cru qu'un jour…;∎ formal oh, that it were possible! si seulement c'était possible!∎ he died that we might live il est mort pour que nous puissions vivrefamiliar (and so on) et tout le bastringue;∎ it was a very posh do, waiters in white gloves and (all) that c'était très classe, avec des serveurs en gants blancs et tout le bastringue;∎ she went on about friendship and (all) that elle parlait d'amitié et tout ce qui s'ensuit(a) (what's more) en plus;∎ it's a forgery and a pretty poor one at that c'est une copie et une mauvaise en plus∎ perhaps we're not so badly off at that en fait, on n'est peut-être pas tellement à plaindre;∎ it might be worth trying at that ça vaudrait peut-être le coup∎ at that, he paused à ce moment-là, il a marqué un temps d'arrêt(a) (indicating character or attitude) comme ça;∎ she's like that, she never says thank you elle est comme ça, elle ne dit jamais merci;∎ don't be like that ne soyez pas comme ça(b) (close, intimate) comme les deux doigts de la main;∎ the two of them are like that ils sont comme les deux doigts de la main;∎ he's like that with the boss il est au mieux avec le patron2 adverb(in that way) comme ça;∎ stop looking at me like that! arrête de me regarder comme ça!∎ if he refuses, not that he will, is there an alternative? s'il refuse, même si cela est peu probable, est-ce qu'il y a une autre solution?;∎ he's already left, not that it matters il est déjà parti, encore que ce soit sans importanceenfin;∎ I'll do anything, that's to say anything legal je ferais n'importe quoi, enfin du moment que c'est légal;∎ I work at the hospital, as a receptionist that is, not as a nurse je travaille à l'hôpital, enfin à la réception, pas comme infirmière;∎ I'd like to ask you something, that is, if you've got a minute j'aimerais vous poser une question, enfin, si vous avez un instant(a) (in that manner) de cette façon;∎ what makes him act that way? qu'est-ce qui le pousse à agir comme ça?;∎ that way you'll only make things worse de cette façon, tu ne feras qu'empirer les choses∎ she's funny that way c'est son côté bizarre;∎ I didn't know he was that way inclined je ne connaissais pas ce côté-là de luilà-dessus;∎ with that, she left sur ce ou là-dessus, elle est partie -
20 purpose
['pə:pəs]1) (the reason for doing something; the aim to which an action etc is directed: What is the purpose of your visit?) formål2) (the use or function of an object: The purpose of this lever is to stop the machine in an emergency.) formål3) (determination: a man of purpose.) beslutsomhed•- purposefully
- purposeless
- purposely
- purpose-built
- on purpose
- serve a purpose
- to no purpose* * *['pə:pəs]1) (the reason for doing something; the aim to which an action etc is directed: What is the purpose of your visit?) formål2) (the use or function of an object: The purpose of this lever is to stop the machine in an emergency.) formål3) (determination: a man of purpose.) beslutsomhed•- purposefully
- purposeless
- purposely
- purpose-built
- on purpose
- serve a purpose
- to no purpose
См. также в других словарях:
Formal concept analysis — is a principled way of automatically deriving an ontology from a collection of objects and their properties. The term was introduced by Rudolf Wille in 1984, and builds on applied lattice and order theory that was developed by Birkhoff and others … Wikipedia
Object Management Group — Formation 1989 Headquarters Needham, Massachusetts Website … Wikipedia
Object-oriented ontology — (OOO) is a metaphysical movement that rejects the privileging of human existence over the existence of nonhuman objects.[1] Specifically, object oriented ontology opposes the anthropocentrism of Immanuel Kant s Copernican Revolution, whereby… … Wikipedia
Object-oriented analysis and design — (OOAD) is a software engineering approach that models a system as a group of interacting objects. Each object represents some entity of interest in the system being modeled, and is characterised by its class, its state (data elements), and its… … Wikipedia
Object-Z — is an object oriented extension to the Z notation developed at the University of Queensland, Australia. Object Z extends Z by the addition of language constructs resembling the object oriented paradigm, most notably, classes. Other object… … Wikipedia
Object Action Complex — Object Action Complexes (OACs) are proposed as a universal representation enabling efficient planning and execution of purposeful action at all levels of a cognitive architecture (Kruger 2009, Worgotter 2008, Geib 2006, Piater 2009). OACs combine … Wikipedia
Object incorporation — is a linguistic valency decreasing operation employed by a number of languages, in particular those with highly synthetic morphologies. Object incorporation is a kind of noun incorporation, more common than the similar process of subject… … Wikipedia
object — [äb′jikt, äbjekt; ] for v. [ əb jekt′, äbjekt′] n. [ME < ML objectum, something thrown in the way < L objectus, a casting before, that which appears, orig. pp. of objicere < ob (see OB ) + jacere, to throw: see JET1] 1. a thing that can… … English World dictionary
Object language — An object language is a language which is the object of study in various fields including logic, linguistics, mathematics and theoretical computer science. The language being used to talk about an object language is called a metalanguage. An… … Wikipedia
formal logic — the branch of logic concerned exclusively with the principles of deductive reasoning and with the form rather than the content of propositions. [1855 60] * * * Introduction the abstract study of propositions, statements, or assertively used … Universalium
Object theory — For the concept of objects in philosophy, see Object (philosophy). Object theory is a theory in philosophy and mathematical logic concerning objects and the statements that can be made about objects. Contents 1 An informal theory 2 Objects 3 A… … Wikipedia
